Search:
  
  Saturday, February 11, 2012
News About Us GP Editors Get Published Newsletter Contact Us


  

Home >> Middle East >> Israel

     Email   Print 

To Save Jerusalem, We Must Kill The Peace Process

Ted Belman - 11/13/2007

The Coordinating Council on Jerusalem, created on October 24, 2007, is off to a good start. The organizations joining, and there are many, have accepted the principle that defending Jerusalem from division is more important than unquestioned support of decisions made by the Government of Israel.

“Preserving an undivided Jerusalem is a paramount issue not only for Israelis, but for the worldwide Jewish Community. This is not a decision any Israeli government can make unilaterally. Jerusalem belongs to all Jews, even those not living in Israel, and their opinion matters.”

But this initiative is meeting some resistance.

First, Rabbi Kanefsky, an orthodox rabbi in California, publicly asked that Jerusalem be negotiable in order not to tie the hands of the government in Israel. But the rabbi was wrong on his facts, wrong on his law and wrong in his belief that a negotiated peace was possible.

Jeff Ballabon summarized the dispute: “As a coordinating council, the relevant question is whether groups want to adopt a “no 2-state” bottom line or a “no negotiations on Jerusalem” bottom line.”

My answer is very simple. If one really wants to keep Jerusalem undivided, and not just mouth platitudes, then one must fight the entire peace process. If Israel cedes Judea and Samaria to the Arabs or recognizes Palestine as the Palestinian national home, it will be impossible to protect Jerusalem from being divided. Our defensive line must be the Jordan River and not the boundaries of Jerusalem.

I previously warned:

    The “peace process” is like an enormous ship traveling with great momentum to a predetermined destination. Nothing Israel can do will stop it or alter its course. While Israel continues to debate the details, the ship continues, inexorably.


The “peace process” is a threat not only to Jerusalem, but also to Israel itself. The peace-mongers, including Rabbi Kanefsky, are so blinded by wishful thinking that they can’t see the facts. They ignore everything the Arabs say and do in pursuit of their blind ambition.

Benjamin Franklin once wrote “One of the great tragedies of life is the murder of a beautiful theory by a gang of brutal facts.”

The die-hards among them are unable to accept that Islamic “peace” and Israel are mutually exclusive, or that the disengagement or withdrawal, unilateral or otherwise, will decrease out security rather than increase it or will bring us war not peace.

When are these liberals going to be mugged by reality?

In focussing on Jerusalem, the campaign allows the “peace process” to continue. This process will ultimately involve a settlement on Jerusalem and most certainly will divest Israel of Judea and Samaria. To avoid this from happening, the campaign should have been to abrogate the whole Oslo process. Anything less will only produce pyrrhic victories.

Aryeh Eldad MK discussed on 11/9/07 the Yisrael Beiteinu’s ‘Red Lines’ in which he pointed out that Avigdor Leiberman’s red lines are not our red lines. Leiberman still wants to give up parts of Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria and even part of Israel. Olmert has assured him that his red lines or “core issues” will not be discussed, so Leiberman remains in the government.

That being the case, Annapolis will discuss and commit on giving away parts of Jerusalem, not including the Holy Basin, and most of Judea and Samaria. It will also commit to a Palestinian state subject only to the Palestinians satisfying Phase I of the Roadmap. Livni and Rice have assured us of that. They also pointed out the responsibilities of Israel in Phase I must also be satisfied. What are they?

“GOI [Government of Israel] takes no actions undermining trust, including deportations, attacks on civilians; confiscation and/or demolition of Palestinian homes and property, as a punitive measure or to facilitate Israeli construction; destruction of Palestinian institutions and infrastructure; and other measures specified in the Tenet work plan.

“GOI immediately dismantles settlement outposts erected since March 2001.

“Consistent with the Mitchell Report, GOI freezes all settlement activity (including natural growth of settlements).

“GOI reopens Palestinian Chamber of Commerce and other closed Palestinian institutions in East Jerusalem based on a commitment that these institutions operate strictly in accordance with prior agreements between the parties.”

Israel intends to comply.

In fact, the campaign allows the Roadmap to proceed with renewed vigor. So what if the Holy Basin or the “right of return” is not discussed now? Israel will be made much weaker to resist both issues when they are discussed. So the campaign yields only temporary respite.

To save Jerusalem, we must kill the “peace process”. And so we must. Nothing short of that will suffice.

As a matter of urgency, we must all campaign to stop the “peace” process.

If Israel goes to Annapolis, all is lost.

Ted Belman also writes for Israpundit.com

Related ArticlesMore By This Author

The Lessons Netanyahu Seems to Have Learned in Shaping Foreign Policy

Between Economics and Politics: Netanyahu and the Domestic Crisis in Israel

Arab Spring, Israeli Winter

Whose "friendship" is more dangerous?

The Strangest Antisemite of Them All

Demonizing Israel and Pretending It Is Ordinary Criticism

Peace process is stuck in 1949

Will President Palin end the futile 'peace process'

Arabs are still suck in rejection

Why I support Sarah Palin

Another reason to reject the Two-State solution

The Truth About Occupation and Settlements

The Parameters of Middle East peace


© 2004-2011 Global Politician