Search:
  
  Saturday, May 26, 2012
News About Us GP Editors Get Published Newsletter Contact Us


  

Home >> Middle East >> Israel

     Email   Print 

Memo To Bibi

Ted Belman - 6/12/2009

Memo to Bibi. What your speech should entail:

The League of Nations granted to Jews everywhere the right to settle in Judea and Samaria. The Palestine Mandate recognized our right to reconstitute our ancient homeland there. The United Nations is bound by this document.

While that is our right as Jews, we are prepared to relinquish our rights to some of the land pursuant to the Roadmap, providing it is based on Res 242 which authorized us to remain on all the land until we had secure and recognized borders. We insist on borders which are defensible and include all settlement blocks. We further insist that it is our right to keep this land without giving anything in return. Res 242 did not require an exchange of land. It is for us alone to determine what are defensible borders.

Negotiations on all matters must be carried out without undue influence and pressure by the US and the international community. It is our right to say “no” to further compromise and to end negotiations if the Arabs are not willing to compromise.

We insist that the settlements are legal according to international law.

The Roadmap included a settlement freeze “consistent with the Mitchell Report”. This report recommended a settlement freeze as a goodwill gesture by Israel in return for the Palestinians ending terror and incitement. It was predicated on a spirit of compromise expected of both sides. Israel will not make such a gesture until the Arabs comply with the spirit and the letter of this report..


Just as Israel can’t have the lives back which were ended because of Arab terror so too, can’t the Arab have back the land on which our settlements grow.

If the Arabs were willing to compromise as required by the Mitchell Report, there would be no need for a settlement freeze. Without compromise there will be no deal.

Furthermore the Mitchell Report didn’t contemplate the split between Hamas and Fatah. Until there is unity among the Arabs, the Mitchell Report is inoperative.

Res 242 is silent on Jerusalem. Jerusalem is ours.

The Arabs must recognize Israel as a Jewish state.

We insist that any Arab entity created be demilitarized.

Based on these parameters, we accept the two state solution.

Based on the Saudi Plan, we utterly reject it.

Ted Belman also writes for Israpundit.com

Related ArticlesMore By This Author

Gunter the Grass and the Spirit of a New Germany

The Lessons Netanyahu Seems to Have Learned in Shaping Foreign Policy

Between Economics and Politics: Netanyahu and the Domestic Crisis in Israel

Arab Spring, Israeli Winter

Whose "friendship" is more dangerous?

The Strangest Antisemite of Them All

Peace process is stuck in 1949

Will President Palin end the futile 'peace process'

Arabs are still suck in rejection

Why I support Sarah Palin

Another reason to reject the Two-State solution

The Truth About Occupation and Settlements

The Parameters of Middle East peace


© 2004-2014 Global Politician